Redesigning Centralized AC Control for Shared Living


Improving multi-room comfort through room-level airflow control and transparent system feedback.

Smart Home Systems

Interaction Design

UX Research

About Project

This project focuses on improving the thermostat experience within the iApartments smart-home ecosystem. The existing system allowed only centralized temperature control, creating friction in shared living environments where residents often had different comfort preferences. The redesign explores ways to introduce room-level airflow control and clearer system feedback, helping users better understand how adjustments affect their living space.

Client

iApartments

Industry

Smart Home

Timeline

8 weeks

Role

UX Designer

Responsibilities

  • User research and stakeholder interviews

  • Competitive analysis and market research

  • Information architecture and user flows

  • Wireframing and prototyping

  • Visual design and interaction patterns

  • Usability testing and iteration

The Challenge

Residents struggled with uneven cooling across rooms and had no visibility into system state. The centralized thermostat failed to accommodate individual comfort needs, leading to frustration and repeated support calls.

No room-level temperature control or airflow adjustment

Invisible system state with no feedback indicators

Confusing adjustment process causing repeated app checks

No confirmation after changes creating system distrust

User Perspective

Rohan, 28

The Tech-Savvy Roommate

Lives in a shared apartment and expects quick, clear responses without needing

to double-check the system.

Pain Points

Bedroom too warm at night

Temperature conflicts with roommates

Wasted energy in empty rooms

Goals

Control bedroom temperature independently

See real-time system status

Reduce energy bills efficiently

Research Insights

Our research uncovered key behavioral patterns and expectations that informed our design strategy. Through interviews and usage analytics, we identified four critical areas where the current system was falling short of user needs.

01

Lack of Granular Control

Single-thermostat systems fail to accommodate different temperature preferences across rooms with varying sun exposure, occupancy patterns, and personal comfort needs.

02

Invisible System State

Users couldn't tell if the AC was actively cooling, in standby mode, or encountering issues—leading to repeated app checks and unnecessary support calls.

03

Delayed Feedback Loop

After adjusting temperature settings, users had no confirmation that their changes were registered, creating uncertainty and fundamental distrust in the system's responsiveness.

04

Energy Concerns

Many residents wanted to reduce cooling in unoccupied rooms to save energy but lacked the visibility and controls needed to implement selective room management strategies.

Quantitative Analysis

Survey data and usage analytics revealed the scale and impact of these pain points across our user base. The numbers painted a clear picture of widespread frustration with the current thermostat system.

User Behavior Breakdown

Repeated checks

Uncertain

Support calls

Temperature Adjustments Over Time

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

Sun

0

2

4

6

8

78%

checked app repeatedly

4.2x

avg app opens per change

81%

desired room control

User Flow

Mapping the journey from temperature discomfort to adjustment confirmation, highlighting critical decision points and feedback loops. This flow prioritizes speed and transparency at every step.

Information Architecture

Organizing the app structure to prioritize room-level controls while maintaining system-wide visibility and settings access. The hierarchy ensures quick access to the most common actions.

Final Experience

  1. Room-Level Vent Control

Users can now control airflow to individual rooms through intuitive sliders. Each room displays current temperature, target settings, and vent position—giving residents precise control over their personal comfort zones. The interface makes it simple to adjust one room without affecting others.

Impact:

Reduces manual vent adjustments

Minimizes roommate conflict

Improves comfort control

  1. Clear System Feedback

Real-time status indicators show exactly what the system is doing—whether it's actively cooling, in standby mode, or scheduling the next temperature change. Visual feedback confirms every adjustment instantly, eliminating the need for users to reopen the app to verify their changes took effect.

Impact:

Eliminates repeated app checking

Builds trust in the system

Improves clarity of actions

  1. Mode Control Redesign

The mode selector was redesigned from a plain text list to color-coded, rounded buttons for each mode - Cool, Heat, Heat/Cool, and Off. The new visual layout is built directly into the app, making mode selection more intuitive and reducing cognitive load.

Impact:

Color coding improves quick recognition

More intuitive mode selection

Visual layout reduces confusion

Design Direction

Our design approach focused on two core principles that would guide every interface decision and interaction pattern. These principles ensured consistency while solving the fundamental problems users faced.

Enable room-level customization without increasing complexity

Provide clear system feedback to build user confidence

User Testing

We conducted usability testing with 12 participants across three residential buildings. Testing sessions focused on core tasks: adjusting room temperature, understanding system status, and controlling vent settings.

Before

After

89%

positive feedback

34%

fewer app re-checks

12s

faster task completion

"Finally, I can control my bedroom without affecting the living room. This is exactly what we needed."

— Participant 3

"The real-time feedback makes me trust the system. I know immediately when my changes take effect."

— Participant 7

"So much simpler than before. I adjusted the temperature on my first try without any confusion."

— Participant 11

Reflection

This project reinforced that users need trust through transparency, not just functionality. By prioritizing clear feedback and room-level control, we transformed frustration into empowerment.

The redesign proved that even complex systems serving shared environments can feel personal and intuitive. Moving forward, the focus is on scaling these principles while maintaining reliability and responsiveness.